Golf returned to the Olympics in 2016, sparking debates about its format.
Some argue it should be for amateurs, especially after many top pros skipped Rio 2016. Adam Scott, a former World No.1, believes that “if you really wanted to grow the game you’d have the Olympics for amateurs.” He has opted out of all three Olympic events since golf’s return.
Despite this, the current trend is to keep it professional. The idea is that amateurs could use the platform to boost their careers or get into top colleges, but that’s not happening now.
Professional vs. Amateur Debate
Many believe Olympic golf should feature only professionals like Rory McIlroy and Jon Rahm. They think having big names compete elevates both the sport and the Olympics itself. Fans might feel that seeing their favorite stars chase gold makes it more exciting.
The event happens every four years, making a gold medal a unique prize even for those with multiple major titles. Golf’s return in 2016 marked its place at the top level of professional sports.
Nick Bonfield thinks showcasing top pros helps grow interest in golf more effectively than featuring amateurs. He suggests tweaking the format for more engagement but keeps his stance against amateur inclusion clear.
Alison Root sees benefits for women’s golf by having elite female players on display globally. She acknowledges that young women might relate more to amateur golfers but believes aspiring to be among the best is crucial.
David Taylor argues that bringing back golf aimed at expanding its audience and showing off its best players achieves this goal better than an amateur-only event would.
Initially favoring amateurs, another viewpoint compares Olympic boxing where winning gold is a peak achievement before turning pro. Now accepting professionals in golf seems effective as player participation grows each year.
Jonny Leighfield supports keeping it professional while allowing high-ranking amateurs if they qualify. He emphasizes entertainment value and commercial sense in featuring top-ranked players over lesser-known amateurs.
Barry Plummer insists on professionals competing to attract non-golf fans through exposure during such a significant global event like the Olympics does for other sports too!
In conclusion: Should Olympic golf stay professional? Or would including amateurs make it better? Share your thoughts!
